Suryakumar Yadav Khushi Mukharji controversy: Filed defaming case against Khushi Mukharji,100 Cr Damages Demanded.!

Suryakumar Yadav Khushi Mukharji controversy: Indian T20 team captain and star batsman Suryakumar Yadav is all set to play in the World Cup. However, before the World Cup, Suryakumar Yadav found himself embroiled in a bizarre controversy.

A statement made by actress Khushi Mukherjee about Surya has escalated to such an extent that the matter has now reached the police and the courts. A fan of Suryakumar has filed a defamation suit against the actress, demanding ₹100 crore in damages.

Suryakumar Yadav Khushi Mukharji controversy: Filed defaming case against Khushi Mukharji,100 Cr Damages Demanded.!

The controversy began when, in an old interview, Khushi Mukherjee claimed that Suryakumar Yadav used to message her frequently. She also said that many cricketers were pursuing her. However, she clarified that there was no romantic relationship between her and Surya. But as soon as this news went viral on social media, Surya’s fans were outraged and accused the actress of trying to gain publicity by tarnishing the player’s image.

Fan Files FIR on Khushi Mukharji.!

A big fan of Surya and a social media influencer from Mumbai, Faizan Ansari, has taken a strong stance on this matter. According to Dainik Bhaskar, Faizan went to the Ghazipur police station in Uttar Pradesh and filed a complaint against Khushi Mukherjee. Faizan claims that Khushi’s claim is completely false and that she deliberately tried to tarnish the image of a national-level player.

Suryakumar Yadav Khushi Mukharji controversy: Filed defaming case against Khushi Mukharji,100 Cr Damages Demanded.!

Suryakumar Yadav’s fan demanded ₹100 Crore in Damages.

Ansari has demanded ₹100 crore in damages. He has also demanded that the police ensure the actress receives at least 7 years in jail for making such misleading claims. Seeing the controversy escalating, Khushi Mukherjee gave an interview to NDTV to clarify her position. She said that her statement was taken “out of context” and that the matter was greatly exaggerated.


Also Read This:

Leave a Comment